EXTRA BITES AND
OTHER DRACULAS, Part I
(part of an
occasional series)
By Thomas Burchfield
I have
read that more movies have been made about Dracula than any other literary
character with the exception of Sherlock Holmes.
I can’t
confirm this claim, but I certainly haven't seen all of them. Nor do I plan
to. None of those I have seen are great movies, even as horror movies, though a
tiny handful of them are decent entertainment. Some are pure disasters (two of
them by great directors).
In the
1930s, Universal Studios seemed to lack the same fervor for a Dracula franchise
that they brought to the first three Frankenstein classics. The Vampire King
was only fleetingly glimpsed in a coffin in Dracula’s
Daughter (1936), a film I’ve seen three times without remembering much
about it, except for its murky lesbian theme. Otherwise, the Count was left to
sleep, forgotten in his tomb.
In 1943,
Universal finally got around to resurrecting him with Son
of Dracula. The good news was that they decided to employ the best
special effects available in a worthy attempt to make Dracula into a magical shapeshifter, backed up with an excellent atmospheric production. The story, like
my novel Dragon’s
Ark, imagines Dracula in America, in this case, New Orleans. (An
inspiration for Anne Rice? Ask her.)
The bad
news? Simple: Lon Chaney, Jr. as Dracula. Why this baffling decision?
Surely, they didn’t mistake Bela
Lugosi for dead, as he was appearing for Universal in drecky movies like Ghost of Frankenstein. He even played
the Monster in Frankenstein Meets The
Wolf Man (a better movie than it sounds, especially its dynamite opening).
As for
Chaney as Dracula, while the actor could deliver on occasion (Of Mice and Men, The Wolf Man, High Noon),
he remains, I’m afraid, the dullest Dracula in horrordom. His leaden manner,
like a bored bank president’s, weighs the movie down like clay. It’s not his hypnotic
stare, but his acting that puts his victims to sleep. The result is one of
those movies that inspires such comments as “ . . . but they blew it.”
If not
Lugosi, a better Dracula would have been legendary character actor John Carradine whose
tall gaunt physique nicely mirrors Bram Stoker’s creation. In fact, Carradine
did don the black cape for Universal twice: in House of Frankenstein and House
of Dracula. But these were mildly amusing, hurried cheapjack shows with
Universal wringing the last drop of blood from the sponge before pretty much
tossing it out to dry. Carradine appeared once more as the Count in Billy the Kid Meets Dracula (1966), but that’s
one not on my Big Sleep list.
In the
1950s, Dracula, of course, struck like lightning in the person of Christopher
Lee. Otherwise, there seem to have been only a few stabs at the character: Return of Dracula, (1958) featured Francis Lederer (a real
interesting chap as you’ll see from the link) as another Dracula-in-America. I saw
the beginning as a little kid, but don’t recall too much beyond my mother
sending me to bed long before it was over.
I’m
probably missing a few things, including Andy Warhol’s Dracula (not on the Big Sleep list, either; Warhol’s Frankenstein was plenty.) So, we’ll fly on
to 1973’s Dracula, a non-supernatural
version with a game Jack Palance as the Count. (Palance, a Method actor, allegedly
complained that he identified with Dracula a little too much.) Written by Richard Matheson and
directed by Dan Curtis, it was a fairly entertaining movie, with some good
action scenes.
In
1977, the BBC produced a videotaped version,
an almost scene-for-scene adaptation of the novel (not necessarily a virtue
with me). It starred suave Louis Jourdan as a Frenchified Count, making a handsome
but featherweight, concierge Dracula. The only memorable thing about it was Frank
Finlay as a coarse and eccentric Van Helsing. The production tried hard, but no
matter, videotape would make Gone with
the Wind look cheap and flat. Even the outdoor scenes have that canned,
studio-inflected feeling.
In
1979, Universal released a splashy version, starring Frank Langella and
Laurence Olivier. This one was based on the Broadway revival of the original—and
terrible—stage play that also featured sets by Edward Gorey. Unfortunately,
nothing of the great Mr. Gorey remains in the film. I despised this version the
first time I saw it, partially because the Byronic/Freudian hot pants interpretation
of Dracula, as embodied by the then-young Langella, holds no interest for me.
(They also failed in not opening the film with Harker's journey to Transylvania, one feature every adaptation should contain, no matter what else they do.)
Also, this Dracula's supernatural effects also seem ludicrous and cheap for all the money they spent elsewhere. However, the second time around, I picked up on some eerie, clever touches by director John Badham and enjoyed Freddie Jones’s fly-specked turn as Renfield. Maybe a third look will improve my attitude.
Also, this Dracula's supernatural effects also seem ludicrous and cheap for all the money they spent elsewhere. However, the second time around, I picked up on some eerie, clever touches by director John Badham and enjoyed Freddie Jones’s fly-specked turn as Renfield. Maybe a third look will improve my attitude.
Around
that time, Werner Herzog, one of the greatest film auteurs ever, did a remake
of Murnau’s Nosferatu. As the
original is already a great movie, this seems a questionable idea, at best. In
the end, I found it a mismatch between artist and material. Herzog’s slow,
hypnotic style seems like it might work at first, but after awhile the film slackens
and the scenes seem rushed, the acting sloppy, and there’s not one image as
striking as the shadows cast by F.W. Murneau. Klaus Kinski is alright as
Orlock, but Max
Schreck is still smiling up from Hell. As for Herzog, I think it’s a mere
misstep in a great career.
Then,
in 1993, came Bram Stoker’s Dracula,
directed by Francis Coppola, a title I’ll take down—up next time.
(BUT no column next week, as I
will be on Thanksgiving vacation. A safe and warm holiday to all of you! Thanks
for coming by!)
(Re-edited 11/21/11; Laurence Oliver . . . really now.)
(Re-edited 11/21/11; Laurence Oliver . . . really now.)
Copyright
2011 by Thomas Burchfield
Thomas
Burchfield's contemporary Dracula novel Dragon's Ark is available right
NOW, published by Ambler
House Publishing. It can be ordered in both paperback and e-book editions
through your local independent bookstore, through Amazon, Barnes and Noble, Powell's Books, Smashwords,
Scrib'd
and now at the Red Room. His original comic screenplay Whackers is now
available in Kindle, Nook, iPad and on Scrib'd, also from Ambler House. Other material can also be
read at The Red Room
website for writers. Not enough for ya? He can also be friended on
Facebook, tweeted at on Twitter and e-mailed at tbdeluxe [at] sbcglobal [dot]
net.
2 comments:
I was looking for a "misstep" in Werner Herzog's career and now I know what it is, thanks to Herr Burchfield.
Thanks, John! "Scream of Stone" I thought was pretty lame, too, even with the Patagonia locations.
Post a Comment