It’s no
surprise that we at Castle Burchfield would watch the opening
episode of the new Dracula miniseries,
broadcast on NBC on Friday nights. Since then though, I have failed to take a second look.
Not much surprise there either.
Dracula the series is definitely a
lavish, eye-filling concoction. The producers chose to set this one during the
time of Stoker’s novel, the opulent peak of the Victorian era. The first hour resembles
the perfect coffee table book—with accompanying slides and viewfinder--you might
buy for a history buff relative. Lovers of Victorian bric-a-brac will sigh. To
the eyes, this Dracula is gorgeous.
Dracula
fans, though, may find the rest to be pretty thin-blooded. Oodles of changes have
been made to Stoker’s narrative; nothing wrong with that, but the changes,
while interesting to ponder, turn out rather uninteresting in practice. Some of
them play to woo-woo Twilight fans.
Others are willful and arbitrary rather than thought through.
Among
the most significant is that Van Helsing the Vampire Hunter is now Van Helsing
the Vampire’s Ally (played by Thomas Kretschmann). It seems both he and Dracula
have one epic bloody axe to grind with a secret society called The Order of the
Dragon and have teamed up to destroy it. The Order is a centuries-old Hellfire
Club that has evolved from wielding power with the sword of the supernatural to
wielding it with the sword of Gilded Age capitalism and new technologies borne
of the Industrial Revolution, such as gas and oil.
Not one
to stay behind history (which he always has before), Dracula has refashioned
himself—peculiarly, I have to say—as a wealthy Gilded-Age, Andrew Carnegie type American—really,
what is up with that?—named Alexander Grayson.
Grayson
is developing wireless electricity as a means to not only achieve the power and
wealth he needs to destroy his enemies—why an American fer chrissakes?—but also
to enhance his nocturnal existence, so he will no longer need rely on moonlight
and candles to find his way around. His future will be a world sorely lacking in
shadows, that’s for sure. Not one any serious supernatural being would care to
haunt.
Jonathan
Harker, meanwhile, has become a crusading investigative journalist while Mina
Harker his fiancé, is an ambitious medical student, her sights set on breaking
the glass ceiling into the then exclusively man-castle of professional
medicine. No sign of flailing Quincy Morris, yet; or Dr. Seward.
Where
Mina and Dracula are concerned, the show hearkens back to the 1990s Coppola
version by making Mina the reincarnation of Dracula’s wife from 1490s
Transylvania—wait a minute’s he’s an American?
I guess it’s a disguise, but . . . .
Most
interestingly, the series solves the Renfield Problem simply by making Renfield
into the most dutiful—and clinically sane and competent--African-American
butler any wealthy white American of that time could wish for. At last, Dracula
has found his Jeeves.
Given its
backdrop of the Industrial Revolution and the rise of modern science—and the
powers it brings—what is Dracula, who should always have the Greater Powers of
Darkness at hand—doing here in the first place? He’s never needed no stinkin’
electricity, that's for sure. Why does he need it now and what does that do his
supposedly supernatural powers? To me, it diminishes them to near irrelevance. This
a Dracula who embraces modernity, absurdly I think and becomes even smaller. He
should be turning on the lights by simple force of will.
Stylistically
Dracula is as sleek and cinematic as
we could wish, but the first episode made gestures that seem merely
distracting. The grand opening ball sequence features the guests dancing like
stick figures to an avant-garde tarantella-like waltz as might be conjured by
Ennio Morricone instead of Strauss or Tchaikovsky. Cute, but how proper Victorians
could even dance to this without breaking their spines requires explanation.
We’re
also treated to a slow-motion, acrobatic wired sword fight, derived from Chinese
action cinema, which has devolved to an annoying tic used in movies with no
real excitement in them. It’s a trick to keep that young demographic from
switching over to Highlander reruns. No
real thrill or urgency here at all.
Finally,
there’s the star of the show, the great compelling void whose cruel whirling gravity
drains the light from the whole world around, namely Dracula. The show falls
short here, too. Real short. Jonathan Rhys-Meyer as Dracula is more than dourly
handsome enough for Twilight fans,
but he’s also a cool cipher with little power and presence. Dracula needs more
than sexual allure. He needs a compelling fearsomeness that Mr. Rhys-Meyers,
who tends to fade whenever he shares the screen with anyone else, lacks. Not
even the wolves would heed his call.
(re-edited 11/7/13)
Copyright 2012 by Thomas
Burchfield
3 comments:
Not even the wolves would heed his call. Nothing could be more clear. And cold.
Enjoyed your review and commentary, though it's hard to make time to watch. Guess I'm not missing much.
Thanks John and Julie: Nope, the wolves are heeding other calls and you're not missing much, unless you did stories about Dracula forming an energy consortium like Enron.
Post a Comment